Oh one MORE thing to legislate!
Dec. 22nd, 2003 09:15 pmMy thanks to
wingedkite for bringing This LOVELY Article to my attention.
Does anyone besides me see how blasted Orwellian this all sounds? Legislate nutrition?!
I'm still shopping for a new country.
Does anyone besides me see how blasted Orwellian this all sounds? Legislate nutrition?!
I'm still shopping for a new country.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 08:14 pm (UTC)"I get enough nutrition, by eating protein biscuits, recommended by the system. It's routine regulation - I had an operation!"
That also vaguely reminds me of the joke Paneb and I have about Ahnolt putting Chromium Piccolinate in the water to "pump up" California. *lmao*
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 08:23 pm (UTC)I think the BMI is a crock, you can't just say every person of this gender who is this height must weigh this much - we have too much variation in our genetics for that. Two women of the same height and dress size for example might have very different weights depending on things like musclle mass and bone density. Add the inherited tendecy towards a body type to it and there is no way such an index can be realistic or useful.
I'm not defending those who would persecute the ample - hell, I am something on the ample side myself, ne? But the measures discussed here fall short of Orwellian on the count that across the board they leave the choice in the hands of the adult comsumer to purchase the foods they wish for themselves and their families. And were they to get Orwellian and try to take that choice away you can bet yer bottom dollar that the massive corporations that manufacture and sell processed and snack foods would even if they eventually lost tie up such a decision in the courts for years while nothing happened. Look at the tobacco industry thing - same tactic in fact, the idea tha an issue of personal choice should be outlawed because of the effects it has on the cost of health care. Same motive, same tactic, same endless debate with no resolution. (And in some cases, same company. After all, Philip Moris owns Kraft foods and many other food companies in their conglomerate.) Ludicrous, but I don't consider them totalitarian. More like...another big waste of tax dollars time and human resources.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 08:31 pm (UTC)Tell me the pharmaceutical interests, mass produced food interests, the insurance interests and the government are all in bed together. Maybe that is why the FDA has been sitting on our 4 tons of organic cumin for the last nine weeks. :-/
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 09:02 pm (UTC)As I said I disagree with pretty much all of it but the school stuff - that government has the right to make decisions about government institutions, and that includes what foods are available in schools, prisons, and other government buildings. This decision making power does not extend to private lives. When they try to cross that line, that is when it becomes totalitarian.
They may all be in bed together but bedfellows are wont to quarrel, especially when their profit motive is threatened. It's just a huge waste of resources all around. Another attempt to distract us from *important* issues. Misdirection - don't think about how much Bush has fucked with the economy, here's something utterly ridiculous to debate instead. I hate it when they do that!
I consider *all* legislations of personal choice offensive.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-23 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-23 09:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-24 11:37 am (UTC)